Working in South Los Angeles where most students are exposed to multiple traumatic events and half endorse traumatic stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms in the clinical range, I wondered what is done in war-torn countries to treat trauma? Because addressing this through individual or small group (6-8 students) interventions by mental health professionals seems burdensome and unfeasible.
Apparently, TEN years ago a short-term intervention to reduce PTSD symptoms among civilians living in low-income and war-torn countries was developed and shows very positive and sustained outcomes among adults AND children.
Further, "both mental health professionals and lay counsellors can deliver NET....[a] study demonstrated how lay counsellors recruited from the local area and trained to deliver NET had results equivalent in efficacy to trials in which NET was delivered by mental health professionals...The lay counsellors who provided both types of therapy were recruited from the local community and were trained for six weeks."
As if all that were not interesting enough, NET aims to create an autobiographical account of a traumatized persons life - with details, coherence, organization, order, the good and bad - which may not only be effective in reducing PTSD symptoms. Given what we know about the nature of a parents narrative of their childhood being a good predictor of the quality of attachment security with their children, NET may also prove to be effective in increasing attachment security between traumatized parents and children (which we know is a mediator and moderator of PTSD development) - that will be my next research question...
Attached is an abstract and excerpt from an article that
describes the research evidence and steps in conducting Narrative Exposure Therapy
(NET).
ABSTRACT
Individuals who have experienced
multiple traumatic events over long periods as a result of war, conflict and
organised violence, may represent a unique group amongst PTSD patients in terms
of psychological and neurobiological sequelae.
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET)
is a short-term therapy for individuals who have PTSD symptoms as a result of
these types of traumatic experiences.
Originally developed for use in low income
countries, it has since been used to treat asylum seekers and refugees in
high-income settings.
The treatment involves emotional exposure to the memories
of traumatic events and the reorganisation of these memories into a coherent
chronological narrative.
This review of all the currently available literature
investigates the effectiveness of NET in treatment trials of adults and also of
KIDNET, an adapted version for children. Results from treatment trials in adults
have demonstrated the superiority of NET in reducing PTSD symptoms compared with
other therapeutic approaches.
Most trials demonstrated that further improvements
had been made at follow-up suggesting sustained change.
Treatment trials of
KIDNET have shown its effectiveness in reducing PTSD amongst children.
Emerging
evidence suggests that NET is an effective treatment for PTSD in individuals who
have been traumatised by conflict and organised violence, even in settings that
remain volatile and insecure.
Conducting
NET
NET is a manualised
treatment. The patient first undergoes psychoeducation in which the theoretical
underpinnings of PTSD and the process of NET and rationale for treatment are
explained. Psychoeducation about how
avoidance of reminders of traumatic events is a key feature of PTSD, and the
impact of this on inhibiting treatment, is provided. Once informed
consent has been obtained, the therapy can begin. Sessions are usually 60–120 min in length and ideally occur in
close succession preferably with one or more
sessions per week and a maximum of a fortnight between
sessions.
In the first session the patient constructs the
‘lifeline’. This is a physical representation of their life using a rope,
beginning at birth and ending at the present day, with a section of the rope
left uncoiled representing the future. The patient then briefly goes through
their life, in chronological order, placing a symbol (e.g. flowers of different
shapes and sizes) on the line to represent happy events and a different symbol
(e.g. stones) for sad or frightening events. The therapist's role is to ensure
the correct chronology of these events. The lifeline is useful in establishing
the therapeutic relationship and in providing an indication of the number of sessions that may be
necessary to address all traumatic events (although some events may
only be disclosed later in therapy).
Following this session, subsequent
sessions are dedicated to the narration of the person's life, in chronological
order, with particular focus on and attention to the traumatic events. Periods
between events are described in brief to contextualise the traumatic events
within the individual's life and produce a
coherent narrative. On approaching a traumatic incident, the focus is
on contextual information, firstly establishing what life was generally like at
that time (where was the person living, what were they doing, what was a typical
day) and then narrowing this down as precisely as possible to what happened when
the event occurred. The traumatic events are
then narrated in great detail, gently resisting the patient's attempt to hurry
through or avoid emotional engagement with the memory.
The patient then slowly narrates
their traumatic experience in chronological order, as they experienced it at the
time. They are encouraged to describe all
sensory modalities along with their thoughts and feelings. The aim of
NET is to connect the hot memories into the corresponding information held
within the cold memory for the event and so the patient must be emotionally involved in the
narration but must also put these experiences into words, constantly integrating
the contextual information. At the
same time as the narration of the traumatic event progresses, the patient's
current physical, emotional and cognitive reactions are observed and
verbalised. The therapist
continually guides the patient back and forth between what is happening for the
patient at the time of the narration (present time) and what occurred at the
time of the event. One of the aims of the therapy is for the person
to be emotionally exposed to the memory of the event for sufficient time that
habituation occurs and their emotional response to the memory is diminished over
the course of therapy. However, this is unlikely to occur within a single
session. The session ends at a safe point in the narrative, at the end of a
traumatic event, once the therapist has ensured that the patient's arousal has
diminished and that their emotional state is improved. The events in the period
after the traumatic incident are narrated to help the patient place the episode
in context.
The narrative as
described in the session is written up by the therapist between sessions, this provides an
opportunity for the therapist to ensure they have fully understood the details
and chronology of the events described and therefore highlights areas in the
story which do not seem as coherent and possibly need further exploration at the
next session.
At the beginning of
the next session the narrative from the previous session is read to the patient
to ensure accuracy, once again expose the patient to memories of the event,
elicit further information and promote integration of the hot and cold memories.
Usually the patient notices a reduced
physiological and affective reaction from the first session, although
several sessions may be necessary for habituation to occur for severely
traumatic events.
At the end of the
re-reading of the narrative, the period between this event and the next
traumatic event is briefly narrated, before moving forward to the next traumatic episode, which is
again narrated in intricate detail. This process continues until all stressful events have
been narrated and the affective responses to the memories have reduced. At this point, the patient and therapist will have created a testimony of the person's life from birth to
the present day, with a detailed narration of the traumatic events.
At the end of the therapy some time is spent discussing hopes and
aspirations for the
future, following which all parties who have been involved in the therapy (including the
patient, therapist and interpreter) sign the completed testimony. The patient receives a
copy of this for their own
private records and the authors report that it is common to
find patients sharing
their testimonies with others including lawyers and human rights organizations.
No comments:
Post a Comment